Showing posts with label that wacky internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label that wacky internet. Show all posts

Friday, October 31, 2014

Creepy presents: Bernie Wrightson

While I guess there’s a bit of truth that Dark Horse has become “the place where properties DC and Marvel loses the rights to go to die”, look at all the fantastic collections of material, much of it never before reprinted, that they’ve been putting out. There are few comic book artists who have gotten as much mainstream recognition as Bernie Wrightson, and hence, as many reprints as Wrightson has, but you know what? I don’t care! This little hardcover collecting the work Bernie Wrightson did when he was at Warren is fantastic. No enlarged or reduced pages or panels, no garish coloring. Here’s everything as it as it was meant to be seen. You know something has to be good when you buy it despite already owning most of the stories contained therein!
 A small caveat though, is that, famous as Wrightson’s stories at Warren are, the amount of actual stories he drew for the company is relatively small. A good chunk of the book is made up of his covers, pin-ups, back-covers and frontispieces, as well as stories where he was just the inker.
 But anyway, on to the stories:
 Stories from Creepy:
 -“The Black Cat” from Creepy #62:

 There have been quite a few adaptations of The Black Cat in comics over the years, and I don’t think this was even Warren’s first! But damn, when you read the introduction where Bruce Jones talks about Wrightson won over James Warren by intentionally withholding the pages at first and showing him work he’d done as a teenager, you believe it! Who wouldn’t be blown away by work like this?

 It’s a pretty straightforward adaptation of the story with almost no changes, but what do you expect from a story as done to death as this? Gorgeous stuff.
 Most memorable scene: When the narrator kills his wife. Ugh! That hurts just looking at it. Note how there’s no blood; it’s the sheer furor that sells it.

 -“Jenifer” from Creepy #63:
  This is the infamous shocker which got made into a Masters of Horror episode (aka “The only worthwhile thing Dario Argento has done in years”) and always gets cited when people bring up horror comics stories along with Hoppin’ Down the Bunny Trail and The Monster of Dead End Street. It's so popular Wrightson actually gets sketch requests of it.
 
 Truth be told, as good as the script by Bruce Jones is, I’ve never really gotten into Wrightson’s art that much in this story. It’s great, but I always found the titular character more comical-looking/pitiable rather than frightening, although that’s sort of the point, I guess.

 The story is about a wealthy family man who rescues a deformed and (apparently) retarded girl from being killed in the woods by shooting a man. Not wanting to face a scandal, he buries the body and “adopts” the girl, who he names Jenifer. Jenifer seems to exert a hypnotic influence on the man, making him overlook all the horrible things she does to his family, eventually causing them to leave. Half-horrified and half-attracted to her (Jenifer has quite a body), the man and Jenifer hit the road, with the man trying to escape but always coming back no matter what, sometimes out of pity, sometimes out fear, with each night a living hell of cheap motels, female-on-male rape and the dead bodies of Jenifer’s victims. Yes, it’s a story designed solely to prey on male anxieties about being dominated and a fear of “ugly” women, but it’s so hauntingly, unrelentingly bleak that you won’t even think to criticize the cliché ending.

 Most memorable scene: When Jenifer decides to get “frisky”. This is probably comicdom’s most sickening rape scene.

 Oh, by the way, “feminist” community Scans_Daily sees Jenifer as the real rape victim and completely ignores everything about the story in order to suit their “head-canons”. I wish I was kidding:
All of these dissenters have probably been banned now

-“Clarice” from Creepy #77:

 A man whose wife accidentally died in a blizzard returns, but is she after revenge? And which of them is truly dead? Told entirely in rhyme.
 Not much to say about this one either in terms of art or story (it is only 5 pages, with four panels to each page), but I do like Wrightson’s snow effects and how he tries to downplay the horror aspects to fit the romantic, melancholy mood of the story.
 Most memorable scene: I usually try to avoid spoilers, but the last two panels manage to be surprisingly emotional, although the ending doesn’t really make sense to me.

-“Country Pie” from Creepy #83:

 This one was actually drawn by Carmine Infantino and only inked by Wrightson. It’s about a woman hunting down a serial killer. We see a woman who is apparently the one tracking the killer, hitchhiking  undercover along with her ‘little brother’, getting in a car with a man who is apparently the killer on a lonely, country road. Seems pretty reckless bringing a child along on such a mission, and we never see how our undercover girl is communicating with the police.

 Sure enough, there’s a twist, and I’m going to go ahead and give it away. The girl and her little brother are the killers, the man is just a horny travelling salesman and the woman hunting the killer is actually a psychic observing this all from afar. Oddly enough, there’s a happy ending. Pretty weak overall and the misdirections are obvious.
  Infantino would later draw a much better (or at least, more atmospheric) story about a serial killer targeting travelling salesmen. Wrightson’s hand can barely be felt.
 Most memorable scene: When the salesman is thrown into a lake and observes the corpses of all the other victims. “Sis” must be a good swimmer to have tied them all down like that.

-“Dick Swift and his Electric Power Ring” from Creepy #86: A terminally ill young boy is comforted by the author of his favorite dime novel hero as he lies dying. However, the author has a secret: The electric power ring from the stories is real, and he gives it to the boy. I’m not spoiling this one.

 This is a very sad, sentimental story that nevertheless manages to be uplifting. Warren re-used this plot several times, but this time was the best. Infantino & Wrightson’s styles mesh perfectly this time, capturing the mix of sadness and childlike wonder that pervades the story.
 Most memorable scene: The ending, but since I’m not going to spoil it, I’ve decided to focus on the glimpses of the dime novel itself, which are pretty funny (and spot on if you’ve ever seen any 19th century dime novels) even though it looks more like a comic book.
 -“A Martian Saga” from Creepy #87:
A stranded astronaut  with a rapidly dwindling air supply is welcomed by a Martian tribe, kills a monster, saves a girl, is rewarded with sex, then dies from lack of oxygen.
 There are worse ways to go.
 Kidding aside, this is a good one, not so much for the story, but for the way it’s told. There’s no dialogue and everything is written in limericks. I love when writers mix comics with poetry, but I love it even more when the poetry is good, and Nicola Cuti’s certainly is. The subject matter may be a bit far afield from what you’d expect from Wrightson, but it’s still beautifully drawn, and with just one look at the ‘Martian monster’ (that looks more like a werewolf) you know you’re in Wrightson territory. Dig the full page, thin panels too on every page, similar to “Clarice”’s four panels-a-page grid. Wrightson’s layout skills are underrated.

 Most memorable scene: Our hero’s tragic death. Like I said, there are worse ways to go.

-“The Laughing Man” from Creepy #95:

 A disheveled explorer staggers out of the African jungle and relates the strange tale of what happened to him and his partner, Briggs. The two were on a quest to find a tribe of intelligent apes to bring back to a freak show, which Briggs hoped to infiltrate by skinning and dressing up as one. Unfortunately, the apes were watching, and strong adherents to the old phrase “Monkey see, Monkey do”…

 If you can overlook that Wrightson’s art here is cartoonish to the point of caricature, this is easily the, well, creepiest of his stories for Creepy. I’m not including a “most memorable scene” for this one. It needs to be seen all its own. Rarely has the image of a smirking gorilla been so scary, and an excellent way to end Wrightson’s work for the magazine.
 Part of me likes to think the scene of Briggs dressing up in the hollowed gorilla’s skin was inspired Tintin in the Congo. Huh, first boy’s adventure dime novels, now Herge. The writers for Creepy sure loved turn-of-the-century kid’s stuff.
Stories from Eerie:
-“The Pepper Lake Monster” from Eerie #58: A tourist sailing on Pepper Lake runs afoul of the legendary monster of Pepper Lake and decides to capture it, gradually becoming more and more obsessed. His plan seems to be working, but perhaps the monster is not the biggest problem he has to face…

 This is hands down my favorite stand-alone Wrightson work. Sure there are little flaws here and there (Pepper Lake must be the size of one of the great lakes to fit that thing in it), but damn if the drawings of the monster and our hero’s increasingly obsessive attitude still aren’t drawn beautifully. I’m a sucker for lake/sea monster stories in comics (I even considered making it the theme for one past Halloween before realizing there were several I’d overlooked), and this one, with its cynical but perfectly believable twist, is easily the best of them.
 Most memorable scene: There are plenty, but the splash itself is simply incredible. Every medieval mapmaker whoever scrawled a sea serpent would be jealous:

 Here it is in color:

-“Nightfall” from Eerie #60: A young boy named Nemo is harangued night after night by a group of goblins, then by his parents for waking them up. The goblins insist they just want to play, but Nemo knows better.

 I usually love stories about primal childhood fears, but this one is just okay. The design of the goblins looks unintentionally comical. Just look at the one in the splash pages’ tail:

 Looks like a man in a saggy suit.
If you overlook that though, it’s a lot of fun. The boy’s name and a few clever visual gags provide the set-up for this to be a wonderfully dark parody of Winsor McKay’s Little Nemo, but it never goes far enough. Still, you have to love that wash work.
 Most memorable scene: The Little Nemo shout-out, by far.

 Dime novels, Tintin and now Little Nemo. Yeah, someone at Warren was definitely a big fan of turn-of-the-century children’s entertainment. Love it.
-“Cool Air” from Eerie #62

 Coming away from comics beloved in countries that don’t like comics or speak English, we come to the world of pulp magazines with this adaptation of Lovecraft’s Cool Air, the story of a man made immotal being keeping himself frozen temperatures, which has had a number of retellings in comics (and what do you think inspired Mr. Freeze?), but this is the best.
 Most memorable scene: The money-shot at the end:

Oh come on, even if you’ve never read Lovecraft’s story, how did you think a story about a man kept alive by the cold would end?
-“Reuben Youngblood: Private Eye in: Beware the Scarlet Combine” from Eerie #72:

 Depression era private eye Rueben Youngblood accepts a job as a bodyguard for some wealthy Germans having a party on a zeppelin, shortly after his partner was murdered by a blood cult called The Scarlet Combine. Little does he know that the Combine is closer than he thinks...
 I was initially hesitant about this one since it’s really more of a detective story/pulp parody than outright horror, but it’s actually my favorite in this volume of the stories I haven’t read before, mostly because it’s so different. The writing tries a little too hard to create a period atmosphere, but it’s still a fun read. I could easily see this being a decent poverty row horror movie, or serial. Also, Wrightson’s art is excellent. He apparently relished the chance to draw a good old fashioned adventure story.
 Most memorable scene: The escape from and destruction of the zeppelin. If you’re wondering why Youngblood and his lady friend are dressed like that, it’s because of a costume party.

-“The Muck Monster” from Eerie #68:

 A Frankenstein-like mad doctor creates a monster from a blob which came to earth on a meteor, but the blob is sentient and realizes it has no place in the world of man, and thus refuses to come to “life” despite the scientist’s methods. The doctor hacks the creature up in frustration and dissolves it in acid, dumping it outside, but instead it oozes into a nearby cemetery and fuses with a long dead corpse. Now having been brought to life against its will for real, the ‘creature’ sets out to find a purpose….

 Despite the title, this story manages to be a melancholy, surprisingly, optimistic blending of both the blob monster and Frankenstein archetypes, with maybe a little inspiration from The Incredible Shrinking Man, at least as far as the ending goes (“To God there is no Zero” pretty much sums this whole thing up). Good as the story is, the real draw, is of course, Wrightson. Along with “The Pepper Lake Monster”, it’s the most beautifully drawn of all the stories here, and like the Arcane stories in Swamp Thing #2-3, feels like a dry-run for Wrightson’s later Frankenstein illustrations, but even more so. The ‘Muck Monster” is virtually identical to Wrightson’s Monster, and the unnamed scientist is also identical to his Victor:
 

 Even the damn test tubes are similar!
This is also the only story here printed in color. Wrightson was reportedly unhappy with the coloring, but it doesn’t really obscure any detail. Finding black and white copies of this story isn’t difficult anyway. In fact, if you’re really curious, you can buy the recent “Artist’s Edition” from Fantagraphics (I thought they hated horror comics over there? Must need the money) which reproduces Wrightson’s original art in full:
 

 Currently going on Amazon for the cheap, cheap price of $74.99. At that price, why not buy two?
 Most memorable scene: The liquefied creature “leaking” down a mountain.

Just the panel layout alone is breath-taking.
 That’s the end of the stories reproduced in this volume, the rest of the book is mostly covers and introductory splash pages. Some are good, some are a little too cartoon-y for my tastes.
  All in all, while some of the stories are a bit better than others, everything here is just of such high quality it is impossible not to love this volume. I give it a full 5/5.
 
Now if only DC would put out a Wrightson collection like this…
Happy Halloween!
 

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Then and Now: How Fanboy Perceptions have Changed:

 

 Comic book fans are a fickle lot, it’s true. One minute you can be a popular enough artist to afford a mansion and rare autographed baseballs, the next minute your artwork is tagged “eye-bleach” by the same people who used to read your comics. One minute you’re considered one of Marvel’s most essential villains and the #1 foe of one of their most popular heroes, the next minute you’re called a racist stereotype, a minor villain at best and used as a joke in a major motion picture.
 
 However, fickleness can also have its unexpected upsides. One minute you’re a forgotten supporting character in a Dracula comic no one under 30 has heard of; next minute you have your own billion dollar film franchise and are more well-known than Spider-Man on an international level. One minute you’re the most maligned cartoonist in America and the subject of countless memes; the next minute everyone comes out in support of you Capra-style after you get pranked by some douche in a yellow hat at comic con.
 
 And so on the cycle goes, who knows in which way?
 So let us take a look at how the sands of time have healed wounds, wounded heels and buried once beloved creators, characters and movies; some deservedly, some not.
 Creators:
 Jack Kirby:
 How fandom used to see him:
 That ex-Marvel guy who drew a bunch of comics where everyone had square fingertips, big buck teeth and were covered in squiggles.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 Christ incarnate, beloved and infallible creator of Superman, Captain Marvel, every single Marvel character ever, oh and the Romance genre.
 Rob Liefeld:
 How fandom used to see him:
  The epitome of everything that went wrong with comics in the 90s with his traced art, terrible anatomy, bad perspective, stolen poses and poor storytelling abilities. Someday his work will be shown in schools that teach sequential art as a way not to do comics.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
  An unjustly maligned unique stylist who broke away from established model sheets, helped stick it to the Big Two by founding Image and defied gender norms by giving Captain America breasts. Someday his work will be studied alongside that of Fletcher Hanks and Moebius; hailed as the product of one of the medium’s great eccentrics.
 
 (I wish I was making this up, but sadly, if you look around, you’ll find that defending Liefeld these days has become the new equivalent of wearing lenseless glasses, drinking Pabst and watching My Little Brony: Aspergers is Tragic; doing so gains you instant hipster/indie cred)
 

 Carl Barks:
How fandom used to see him:
 
 That guy whose Donald Duck comics were better than other people’s Donald Duck comics.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 The single greatest writer of children’s literature since Lewis Carroll.
 
 If you no agree, you will be burnt at stake in glorious People’s Republic of [some European province that doesn’t use vowels].
(Seriously, there are actually places in Europe where people subscribe to reprints of Barks comics from birth to death and make them mandatory reading)
  Stan Lee:
 How fandom used to see him:
 Crazy, egotistical, flamboyant but always loveable Uncle Stan. A man who helped to aim comics at a slightly older readership, gave artists credit and made celebrities out of them at a time when doing so was unusual and helped to redefine the superhero genre forever.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 'A greedy, talentless hack who never gave anyone credit ever and never did anything but sign his name to other people’s work; all while tying virgins to railroad tracks, kicking puppies and drinking the blood of babies!
 It’s all true; I read it in some post from a guy called kirbyluvver69 on the Comics Journal and Marvel Masterworks forums.'
(Isn’t it funny how the people who bash Lee, whose worst sin was not giving credit for co-plotting, couldn’t give less of a damn about Bob Kane, who really did screw over his collaborators and erase their contributions?)
 
Will Eisner:
 How fandom used to see him:
 The man who elevated the medium of comics to an art form and created storytelling devices at least 40 years ahead of their time that modern creators are still trying to catch up to today. One of the few creators who can be appreciated both by the average superhero fanboy and the indie/arthouse crowd.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 ‘OMG! He drew a supporting character that was a racial stereotype, back in the 40s, which no one else ever did! RAAAAACISSSST!!!!!1!!’
Alan Moore:
 How fandom used to see him:
  A dark, mysterious sorcerer who held a diabolical influence over the Romanovs and was the cause of all of Russia’s ills. Some said he was in league with the devil himself and that he never truly died.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
  A highly eccentric, but mostly harmless oddball who possessed little political power and, for all his faults,  was undoubtedly an ally of the Romanovs and about whom most of which is known comes from accounts written by his enemies; accounts which most serious historians agree are of dubious veracity.
 
Grant Morrison:
 How fandom used to see him:
 That guy whose Vertigo comics were really, really freaky and whose Batman comics were just plain wrong.
 
  How fandom sees him now:

The best thing to happen to Batman since Neal Adams.
 
Neil Gaiman:
 How fandom used to see him:
 A brilliantly accomplished writer inside and outside of comics who has truly elevated the art form to literature with his wry humor, poetic prose and dark fairy-tale sensibilities, justly being the only comics writer to win a World Fantasy Award and gain a following of celebrity fans such as Norman Mailer, Tori Amos and Jonathan Ross.
 
  How fandom sees him now:
 ‘Goth kids read Sandman LOL.’
 
(Could be worse though, Scans_Daily thinks he's the mastermind behind a conspiracy to oppress transwomen---because of a comic he wrote in the 90s that he has since apologized for)
 
Mark Evanier:
 How fandom used to see him:
 
That guy who wrote Groo.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 Plato to Kirby’s Socrates.
Kevin Smith:
  How fandom used to see him:
 ‘An ingenious independent filmmaker whose films accurately capture both geek culture and post-college angst with a style that, for all his constant pop culture jokes, is uniquely his own.’
 
How fandom sees him now:
 
‘Geek sell-out! And he made Batman retroactively piss himself. HACK!’
 
(While I’m not much of a fan of Smith’s post-Dogma work, I feel sorry for him over how he’s gone from being the face of ‘hip geeks’ to having more ‘fake geek’ accusations thrown at him than any overweight cosplayer ever has)
 
 Christopher Nolan:
 How fandom used to see him:
 
  Greatest director of his generation! First person to truly make a great film based on a comic with no pandering to kids! The new Kubrick!
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 
 OMG U GAIZ! He produced a Superman movie where Superman snapped Zod’s Neck! HACK!!!!!!

Characters:
The Joker:
 How fandom used to see him:
‘Greatest villain EVAR! I only read Batman comics for him! Killing Joke rules! Why so serious? LOL.’
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 
‘OMG why hasn’t Batman killed him yet? Overused villain! Killing Joke is misogynistic! Ledger wouldn’t have won if he hadn’t died LOL.’
 
 Doctor Doom:
How fandom used to see him:
 How fandom sees him now:
 
 Ultimate Spider-Man/Peter Parker:
 How fandom used to see him:
‘Best hero in comics! The definitive depiction of the character, superior to the Lee/Ditko original and a far more mature and likeable character than his 616 counterpart!’
 How fandom sees him now:
‘They’re replacing him with a black character? Ugh---Good, I never liked him anyway! He’s a Mary Sue, a whiny brat, and [insert fan-phrases that have lost all meaning here] I hope he never comes back! If he had a corpse, I’d spit on it!'
 Venom:
 How fandom used to see him:
 
 ‘Greatest villain EVER, maaan! Most X-treeeeeme character in the Marvel Universe! They should just kill Spider-Man off and have him take over, ‘cause he’s KEWL!’
How fandom sees him now:
 ‘Oh god, how could I have had such shitty taste back then?’
Black Adam:
 How fandom used to see him:
‘Who?’
 
 How fandom sees him now:
‘Best villain EVAR dudez! Better than Venom!’ So Badasssssss:
 (It’s kinda funny how so many fanboys claim to like Captain Marvel because he represents a more innocent time, yet they themselves have championed this eye-gouging, generic evil twin/anti hero to the point that he has become the face of the franchise).
 
 Namor:
 How fandom used to see him:
 One of comicdom’s great characters, a forerunner of all anti-heroes to come who has managed to remain a vital character decades later because he can be used as either a hero or villain at the drop of a hat.
 How fandom sees him now:
 Marvel’s Aquaman/Black Adam rip-off.
(I wish I was kidding about people who think that.)
 
 Mr. Freeze:
  How fandom used to see him:
 A second rate Captain Cold:
 How fandom sees Captain Cold now:
 
A second rate Mr. Freeze.
 
 Swamp Thing:
  How fandom used to see him:
 
 “Swamp Thing is truly a work of art. There will never be anything like it—now or in the future. So it too will soon fall from its present perch on top of the comic industry. All things must come to an end, and I only hope when the Swamp Thing declines that it is something else, something that is so totally different it is phenomenal, will rise to even loftier precipices, where it too will totter in greatness for its lifetime” (actual letter from Swamp Thing #10).
 
  How fandom sees him now:
 
 "Swamp Thing sucked and no one liked him until Alan Moore LOL."
 
 (Again, I wish I was kidding.)
 
 Loki:
 How fandom used to see him:
 That horn-helmet guy who fights Thor and was the first Avengers villain.
 
 How fandom sees him now:
 ‘OMG Tom Hiddleston!’ *Fangirl squee*
(Sometimes I wish I’d never written this)
 
 Movies:
 
 Superman: The Movie (1978):
 How fandom used to see it:
 The gold-standard for superhero films, with a timeless performance by Christopher Reeve, an impressive four act structure, and a John Williams score that never fails to make the most hard-hearted soul get misty-eyed.
 
 How fandom sees it now:
 
 ‘LOL the effects have dated.’
 
 Batman (1989):
 How fandom used to see it:
 ‘A brooding masterpiece of neo-expressionistic filmmaking by the most innovative director Hollywood has ever seen, and which has redeemed the character after the stench of the Adam West show. Nicholson’s performance as the Joker will never be topped. The only downside is Michael Keaton’s boring turn as Batman.’
 
 How fandom sees it now:
 
 ‘Just a more violent version of the Adam West show made by a Goth sell-out hack and marred by unfunny Nicholson mugging. Michael Keaton’s performance is brilliantly underplayed though, and the film’s saving grace.’
 (Seriously, I do kinda like how fandom has warmed towards Keaton in recent years)
 Batman and Robin (1997):
How fandom used to see it:
The epitome of suck.
 
How fandom sees it now:
 ‘A cult classic! You fans take things too seriously! This movie is a masterpiece because…uhhhh…neon….doesn’t take itself seriously…uhhh…homophobes don’t like Schumacher….something something.’
 
 (Seriously, watching people try and defend this turd as anything other than a so-bad-its-good film is cringe-inducing, especially the “You don’t like it because Schumacher’s gay!’ crowd. These people are in for a rude awakening over the fact that you can’t just force something to become a cult movie)
 
Swamp Thing (1982):
 How fandom used to see it:
It was lame, but at least you got to see Barbeau’s tits…
 How fandom sees it now:
Yeah, Barbeau’s tits really were the best thing about it.
 (No argument here)
 Fantastic Four (1994):
 How fandom used to see it:
 An unreleased film which well-deserved being unreleased.
 
 How fandom sees it now:
 
 Bad, but still a better FF movie than the ones that actually made it to theaters.
 (No argument here either)
 Hulk (2003):
 How fandom used to see it:
 “Not enough action, too much talk, obvious CGI, stupid hulk dogs.”
How fandom saw it’s sequel in 2008:
“Too much action! Not enough talk! Hulk isn’t as endearingly fake-looking! And where’s the first film’s sense of fun with things like the gamma dogs?”
(I hear this a lot on IMDb)
~
 So whether for good or for ill, that’s how things have changed. Hope you enjoyed the list, and who knows how things will change in just a few years?